it is said its better to have loved and lost than to never
have loved at all. i have trouble believing this statement.
hundreds of ppl commit or attempt to commit suicide all the
time because of their lost love. so what would ppl consider in
that particular position? is it better to have loved and killed
yourself than to have never loved at all? if they never loved
then they would still be alive now wouldn't they. also many ppl
who lose a love and don't commit suicide just break down and lose
their life completly. not everyone can just get up and walk off
something so seriously damaging. its better to love and never lose
than to not love at all. loosing your love is like the tearing of
ones soul, there's just no getting over that. and for all those
who have had that happen to them i hope with all my being you find
love again, for nothing can compare to the cold emptyness thats
inside of you.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeslrlq/gamalinda/id24.html (read this).
ReplyDelete...because that is the nature of love. History and human nature makes it evident that it is easier for us to painstakingly linger and hold onto the things that we have already lost than it is for us to accept loss, to accept failure. The need for companionship, the need to feel needed: we all have a burning, aching emptiness in us that makes us do ridiculous things (like commit suicide, or give up on life, or have impractical expectations about what we can restore when we have already lost it or broken it)...that need to need someone, that need to feel needed, it's part of the human condition.